The Committee formulated its responses to the Constitutional Court relating to: the procedure launched to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 99, paragraph 1 and articles 100 and 101 of the Law on Judges, two initiatives launched to estimate the constitutionality of the provision of article 102, paragraph 5 of the Law on Judges, initiative launched to initiate proceedings to estimate the constitutionality and compliance with the ratified international treaty of the provisions of article 214, paragraph 1 to 5 and article 217, paragraph 1, 2 and 5 of the Law on Navigation and Ports on Inland Waterways, proposal to estimate the constitutionality and compliance with the ratified international treaty of the provisions of article 52, paragraph 1 and 6 and article 56 of the Law on High Judicial Council, initiative to estimate the constitutionality of the provision of article 34, paragraph 1 of the Consumer Protection Law, several initiatives to launch procedure to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 26 of the Law on Mandatory Traffic Insurance, initiatives to estimate the constitutionality and compliance with the ratified international treaties of the provision of article 11, paragraph 1 and 3 and article 27, paragraph 5, article 28, article 35, paragraph 1, 3, 4 and 5, article 39, paragraph 1 and articles 42 and 43 of the Law on Financing Political Activities, submitted proposal and initiatives to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 13, paragraph 1 in relation to article 12, paragraph 1, item 6) and article 16, paragraph 2 of the Law on the Military Security Agency and Military Intelligence Agency, initiative launched to estimate the constitutionality of the provision of article 12, paragraph 4 of the Law amending and modifying the Law on Higher Education, initiative submitted to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 190 to 192, article 193, paragraph 1 and article 196 and article 197, paragraph 2 of the Law on the Army, initiative submitted to launch procedure to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 142, paragraph 1, items 3), 5) and 6) of the Criminal Procedure Law, procedure launched to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of the Law on Personal Data Protection article 12, paragraph 1, item 3) part stating “or other regulation passed in accordance with this Law”, article 13 part stating “or other regulation” and article 14, paragraph 1, item 2) part stating “or other regulation passed in accordance with statute”, procedure launched to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 14a, paragraph 1, item 2) of the Personal Income Tax Law, initiative submitted to launch procedure to estimate the constitutionality of the part of the provision of article 3 of the Law on Penalty Interest Rate, initiative submitted to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 15, paragraph 3, article 16, paragraph 4, article 17, paragraph 3 and article 31, paragraph 2, 4, 5 and 6 of the Law on the Central Registry of Compulsory Social Insurance, initiative submitted to estimate the constitutionality of article 37, paragraph 1 and 4 of the Law on the Execution of the Prison Sentence for Criminal Offenses of Organised Crime, initiative submitted to estimate the constitutionality of the provision of article 42 of the Law on Employment Relations in State Authorities, proposal and initiative to estimate the constitutionality of the provision of article 64, paragraph 4, part stating “transference of public authority", provision of article 65, paragraph 4, part stating "including divesting of public authority” and provisions of articles 67, 69, 88 and 89 of the Law on Advocacy, two initiatives submitted to launch procedure to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 9, paragraph 1, item 16) and article 14a, paragraph 1, item 2) of the Personal Income Tax Law, initiative to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 146, paragraph 2 and 3 of the Law on the Army and two initiatives submitted to estimate the constitutionality of the provisions of article 55, paragraph 1 to 3 of the Law amending and modifying the Law on Judges.

The sitting was chaired by Committee Chairman Vlatko Ratkovic.